Love is an important subject for humanity and it is expressed in different cultures and regions in different ways across the world through different gestures, ceremonies, festivals and to document expression of this rich and beautiful emotion, we need your help so we can share and spread the depth of cultures that each region has, the best of how people of that region, celebrate love.
Wiki Loves Love (WLL) is an international photography competition of Wikimedia Commons with the subject love testimonials happening in the month of February.
The primary goal of the competition is to document love testimonials through human cultural diversity such as monuments, ceremonies, snapshot of tender gesture, and miscellaneous objects used as symbol of love; to illustrate articles in the worldwide free encyclopedia Wikipedia, and other Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) projects.
The theme of 2019 iteration is Celebrations, Festivals, Ceremonies and rituals of love.
Sign up your affiliate or individually at Participants page.
To know more about the contest, check out our Commons Page and FAQs
There are several prizes to grab. Hope to see you spreading love this February with Wiki Loves Love!
A new beta feature will soon be released on all wikis: The FileExporter. It allows exports of files from a local wiki to Wikimedia Commons, including their file history and page history. Which files can be exported is defined by each wiki's community: Please check your wiki's configuration file if you want to use this feature.
The FileExporter has already been a beta feature on mediawiki.org, meta.wikimedia, deWP, faWP, arWP, koWP and on wikisource.org. After some functionality was added, it's now becoming a beta feature on all wikis. Deployment is planned for January 16. More information can be found on the project page.
As always, feedback is highly appreciated. If you want to test the FileExporter, please activate it in your user preferences. The best place for feedback is the central talk page. Thank you from Wikimedia Deutschland's Technical Wishes project.
You will not be able to edit the wikis for up to 30 minutes on 17 January 07:00 UTC. This is because of a database problem that has to be fixed immediately. You can still read the wikis. Some wikis are not affected. They don't get this message. You can see which wikis are not affected on this page. Most wikis are affected. The time you can not edit might be shorter than 30 minutes. /Johan (WMF)
Salude a totus.
Augùrios a sos novos amministradores.
Cheria ischire si tra nois b'at calicunu capatze de trivallare azigheddu in còdice, ca una de sas cosas chi nos mancat in sa wikipedia in limba sarda sunt sas istruturas fondamentales (comente podent èssere, in manera simple, sos templates). Calicunu b'est, però semus unu pagu limitados chin sos trastos. Deo carchi template l'apo fatu, però in manera rudimentale (abaidende sa wikipedia cadelana nos abizamus de comente cherent fatos).
Un'àtera cosa chi chèrgio ischire est subra de sos bots. Comente funtzionant? Si podent programmare pro criare pàginas mediante su tool de bortadura de Apertium chi est istadu implementadu in wikpedia? Nessi nessi pro sas paginas chi faghent parte de sa lista de pàginas chi totus sas wikipedias depent tènnere.
Faghidemi ischire ite nde pessades, si so isballiende, e si potimus resonare in paris pro trivallare a carchi cosa.
--Placebo2 (talk) 09:36, 16 Fre 2019 (CET)[risponde]
Salude, e gràtzias pro sos augùrios! Tenes resone, deo so chirchende de annànghere carchi mòdulu e carchi template, cando resesso, ma non so un'espertu e pro como apo petzi adatadu cussos chi bi sunt in àteras wikipedias. E no est nemmancu semper fàtzile. Finas a como apo creadu cussos pro sas coordinatas, sas tzitatziones, sos artistas musicales, su deretu de autore, sas limbas, su controllu de autoridade e àteras cosigheddas, ma fintzas cun cussu de sos albums apo tentu carchi problema e probabilmente, si no apo a resissire in custas dies a l'acontzare a sa sola, apo a pedire agiudu a unu de sos amministradores de vec.wiki, dae sa cale l'apo adatadu (ca cussu de it.wiki teniat un'istrutura completamente diferente chi fiat unu burdellu a l'adatare). Pro sos bots est fintzas unu problema prus mannu, ca deo non so unu programmadore e non nde cumprendo belle nudda. Comente pro su nùmeru galu tropu bassu de sos artìculos, est unu problema chi benit dae su fatu chi sa Wikipedia in sardu no est galu connota e impreada bastante. Apertium l'apo impreadu meda in s'interfache de Wikipedia pro sas bortaduras de sas pàginas, in s'ùrtimu perìodu (comente podes bìdere in sos ùrtimos artìculos chi apo fatu), ma non dio èssere de acordu a l'impreare cun unu bot ca, fintzas si est un'aina de importu mannu e chi illestrat meda su traballu, comente cun totu sos tradutores automàticos sas bortaduras tenent medas errores chi podent èssere acontzados petzi dae una pessone chi connoschet sa limba. E fintzas sas tzitatziones e sos templates, apo bidu, cherent postos belle totus a banda e manualmente, ca non benint insertados in manera automàtica. Cun unu bot nos diamus agatare cun deghinas de artìculos cun unu muntone de errores siat ortogràficos e grammaticales e siat de àtera casta (de significadu, tzitatziones bòidas, templates chi mancant, immàgines cun sas didascalias chi abbarrant in italianu o inglesu e gasi sighende). Diat èssere prus unu problema chi àteru, a bisu meu. Deo penso chi si unu cheret bortare sos artìculos in cussa lista diat èssere mègius chi lu fatzat bortende·los unu pro unu, in manera de los tènnere acabados comente si tocat e de non tènnere s'arriscu de nde tènnere sa majoria iscritos male e chi abarrant a metade.--L2212 (talk) 16:47, 16 Fre 2019 (CET)[risponde]
Pro sos templates: Eja provende a pigare sos templates dae àteras wikis no andat semper bene ca meda bortas issos tenent sistemas "a matrioska". Pro fàghere un esempru, su template Bidda chi tenimmus nois est una pàgina guasi statica; ma cussos issoro mandant a àteros templates etz etz. Cussos diant èssere sos menzus, ma sunt fintzas sos prus difìtzeles de fàghere pro chie no est programmatore. Su chi potimus fàghere est a iscriere inoghe si agatamus bonos esempros de carchi àtera wiki de sighire (deo dia a pigare sa cadelana), de manera chi totus potimus pigare dae cussos e uniformare sos templates nostros. Est petzi un'idea. Pro sos bots, su chi as nadu tue est beru, sa bortadura automàtica no est affidabile a su 100%. Si podet pessare, prus in dae in antis, de fàghere carchi bot prus simple chi nos agiuet a annànghere pàginas (ca semus tropu pagos pro fàghere totu a manos e tenimus una créschida tropu lena). A donzi modu mi faghet meda piaghere chi nde semus faeddende, a su mancu sa wiki nostra non paret gai morta che a primma :) --Placebo2 (talk) 13:22, 17 Fre 2019 (CET)[risponde]
So cuntentu fintzas deo chi semus torrende a chistionare inoghe, dae sos archìvios si bidiat comente prus colabant sos annos e prus de mancu acontessiat. In cada manera, pro sos templates est giai unu mesu casinu ca medas sunt giai fatos e benint dae mitzas diferentes, diamos dèpere chircare sos chi sunt su prus possìbile cumpatìbile cun s'istrutura chi tenimus nois, ma su problema est a la connòschere comente si tocat. Pro su bot pro agiudare a annànghere pàginas ite cheres nàrrere? S'interfache de tradutzione chi tenet Apertium integradu chi b'at giai como mi paret chi su traballu l'illestret bastante, fintzas si tenet sos lìmites suos. Deo, si dio tènnere sa possibilidade, dio mancari pònnere carchi cosa pro acontzare automaticamente sas categorias o pònnere carchi template in prus in sos artìculos in ue si podet. Ca fintzas pro automatizare cussas cosas non tenimus nudda (pro nàrrere, pro pònnere su template de su "Controllu de Autoridade" in ue fiat possìbile so andadu a modificare unu pro unu totu sos artìculos de sos iscritores chi apo agatadu).--L2212 (talk) 19:33, 17 Fre 2019 (CET)[risponde]
Augurios meda a is nous duus aministradoris!!! (Apu cumprendiu beni chi seis duas??). Moi potzu andai in pensioni ;) Iscuseis si no femu meda presenti prima, ma su tempu fiat cussu chi fiat e apu cicau de fai su minimu sindacali. Gratzias torra po s'agiudu in custus annus e innantis! --Elcaracol(Tzerriamì puru)13:29, 18 Fre 2019 (CET)[risponde]
Emmo L2212, fintzas carchi cosa pro acontzare automaticamente sas categorias e pònnere carchi àteru template diat èssere bonu comente comintzu. Commo provo a mi documentare e si resesso a agatare carchi cosa chi nos potat agiuare pro fraigare unu bot, l'iscrio inoghe. Unu bot importante diat èssere fintzas cussu pro currègere sas faddinas ortogràficas. Ah, commo m'est bènnidu a conca chi faltat unu template pro sos artìculos bortados, una cosa che a custu template de un'àtera wiki . Est importante fintzas a nàrrere cando una pàgina est istada pigada dae un'àtera wiki, ca podet daere chi sas cosas càmbient dae una natzione a s'àtera. Su problema meu est chi cando b'apo provadu non bi l'apo fata a lu fàghere. --Placebo2 (talk) 19:21, 20 Fre 2019 (CET)[risponde]
P.S. Gràtzias meda a tie puru Elcaracol pro su traballu tou!
AB, tando faghe·mi ischire si agatas carchi cosa chi andet bene! Pro su template apo a li dare un'abbaidada prus a tardu deo, proo a bìdere si bi resesso deo a lu bortare!--L2212 (talk) 19:23, 21 Fre 2019 (CET)[risponde]
Gràtzias L2212! Est perfetu! Iscusa si ti torro a iscriere appustis de duas chidas ma non bi la fia pròpiu faghende a bi intrare. B'at un'àtera cosa chi fortzis tocat de acontzare. Una paja e meses faghet apo fatu sas pàginas de agiudu. Commo apo bidu però chi in su menù a manca, a suta de "Pàgina a sa tzurpa", b'est galu su link betzu a mediawiki. Fortzis potimus pònnere custu link de sa pàgina in sardu e poi proare a agabare totu sa ghia in limba nostra (chi no apo agabadu, a dolu mannu). Apo fatu fintzas sas pàginas tutorials, ma cussas puru sunt a metade, tantu pro nàrrere. --Placebo2 (talk) 21:42, 10 Mar 2019 (CET)[risponde]
Fatu fintzas cussu! Non b'at problema, si tenes unu problema faghe·mi ischire! Como sa pàgina diat èssere cussa, gràtzias meda pro sa bortadura e in generale pro su traballu tuo! Pro sas àteras pagina de agiudu eja, diat èssere una cosa de importu, ma a dolu mannu in custas dies deo non tèngio su tempus netzessàriu pro bortare totu cussa roba. Tue si acabas cussas cosas chi as giai incumintzadu pùblica pure cando cheres, si a pustis b'at carchi cosa pro sa cale podet servire s'agiudu de un'amministradore mi podes semper mutire. In cada manera pro como apo tramudadu sas pàginas, ca pro su chi apo bidu in belle totu sas wikipedias (francu fortzis petzi s'italiana) su tutorial e totu sas suta-pàginas suas sunt suta de Wikipedia: e non de Agiudu:.--L2212 (talk) 23:55, 13 Mar 2019 (CET)[risponde]
Saludi a totus. Torru in custu arraxonu bèciu po donai sa disponibilidadi mia a agiudai cun is template si serbit. Fia de diora chi bolia imparai càncua cosa de prus apitzus de su linguàgiu de templating de Wiki e apu incumentzau ariseu cun is struturas de basi. Apu arrangiau Template:Bidda po funtzionai mellus cun abotzus e tzitadis chi no impreant sa classificatzioni italiana. Mi parit chi siat bessiu beni. Prus traballu podit essi fatu po dd'adatai mellus ancora, ma mi parit chi po imoi andit beni de aici.--PNNu (talk) 12:44, 8 Nad 2021 (CET)[risponde]
Salude @PNNu, gràtzias medas pro sas modìficas tuas! Mescamente su de sos datos chi abarraiant bòidos e si bidiant (a tipu "{{{Apendìtzios}}}") fiat unu problema mannu, ca fiat lègiu a beru. Fintzas pro mene pro como andat bene, mancari prus a in antis diat èssere bellu a annànghere sa possibilidade de pònnere fintzas incuadramentos e istemmas a banda de s'immàgine printzipale, gasi comente est in àteras limbas, ma no est urgente. Deo aia fintzas pensadu a sa possibilidade de bortare in sardu su Template:Divisione Amministrativa italianu, ma penso chi cussu diat èssere unu traballu tropu longu, fintzas ca in cussu casu diamus dèpere modificare cada artìculu in ue b'est giai su template Bidda pro bi pònnere su "gradu amministrativu" . De àteru de fàghere inoghe tenimus de cumprèndere proite in su Template:Limba no aparit su nùmene de sa limba (a esèmpiu in s'artìculu Limba sarda) o mancari, bidu chi @Mattafalluga at creadu unos cantos templates bellos meda pro sas maladias, sas formas de bida e fintzas sos monumentos e sas sèries tv, diat pòdere èssere ùtile a nche los pònnere in pàginas a banda e a los impostare pro fàghere in manera chi los potzant impreare fintzas impitadores chi non connoschent bene su còdighe chene arriscare de tocare su chi non depent e de fàghere casinu. Ma a nàrrere sa veridade cale si siat contributzione diat èssere de agiudu, ca nde mancant medas fintzas pro àteras cosas! L2212 (talk) 13:44, 10 Nad 2021 (CET)[risponde]
Saludi @L2212. A primu gràtzias a tui po s'apretziamentu tuu. Apu arrangiau su tìtulu de Template:Limba. A sa fini fiat sceti una faddina de nòmini de paràmetru. Po cantu tocat su template Divisione amministrativa, nc'apu pensau deu puru. Mancai dd'iaus a podi impreai po totu is divisionis chi no funt biddas. E nci-nd'at meda: Stadu, Regioni e calisisiat divisioni impreeint in àterus stadus (Land de sa Germània, etc). Apu biu deu puru su traballu de @Mattafalluga e apu copiau de issu po Rick and Morty. Mi parit chi siat impreendi (agiumai) sèmpiri su Template:Infobox, sceberu flessìbili meda ma unu pagu complicau po impitadoris nous. Candu seus segurus de is informatzionis chi boleus, si podint creai template prus simpris, comenti as nau tui. --PNNu (talk) 21:28, 10 Nad 2021 (CET)[risponde]
Salude, fintzas a mie mi paret prus bellu e ordinadu meda como su template:Bidda, gràtzias @PNNu. Una pàriga de chidas fàghet aia fintzas comintzadu a "isperimentare" unu template (infobox) pro is istados (mirade pro esempru Grètzia) usende·nde unu chi fiat giai bellu prontu e chi aia agatadu acontzende àteros istados, non mi so postu a fàghere template:istadu proite est semper cosa de frastimare cando mi nche pòngio in custos ròllios, però si diat pòdere fàghere, chi calincunu nde tenet sa passèntzia. Pro sas àteras cosas est berus, deo uso giai semper Template:infobox ca est prus lestru de usare cando si ddoe pigat unu pagu sa manu. In prus s'agatant àteros templates bene fatos e serrados chi no isco comente pòdere sincasu unu pagu modificare (mirade a inoghe pro esempru Quercus ilex) o prus che totu torrare a usare pro àteros artìculos chentza de nd'essire foras de conca. Ant a èssere prus seguros pro chistiones de vandalismos o pro non fàghere matzimurros is usuàrios cun pagu esperièntzia, però sunt complicados de usare (deo galu non bi so pòdidu renèssere).--Mattafalluga (talk) 12:53, 11 Nad 2021 (CET)[risponde]
@PNNu gràtzias torra pro s'acontzu, non mi nde fia abigiadu de cussa faddina! Pro su chi pertocat a s'idea tua de impreare Partzidura_amministrativa a su nessi pro su restu deo so de acordu, ca est beru chi pro cussas cosas templates non nde tenimus. Fintzas in Sardigna su chi paret unu template est imbetzes una tabella. Tenende cussu so pensende chi diamus pòdere remplasare Template:Bidda, prus a in antis, o cun unu bot o fintzas cun una re-diretzione e ponende sos valores de como comente sinònimos in su template, comente est in aterue (a es. in Template:Biografia, in ue valores che a "perìodu_de_atividade" e "atividade_perìodu" sunt ligados a su matessi elementu) in manera chi totu sos artìculos s'agiornent in automàticu. A pustis, pro su gradu amministrativu, si bi diat abarrare petzi cussu de annànghere, non penso chi diat èssere tropu longu a lu fàghere, ca apo pompiadu como e su template b'est petzi in 209 artìculos. Su problema est semper su tempus pro bortare totu sas cosas, a su mancu como.
Salude @Mattafalluga! Cussu template l'aia adatadu deo dae sa Wikipedia italiana ocannu coladu, paris a su Template:Istadu_istòricu. A propòsitu de cosas de fàghere, difatis, depo galu bortare su manuale e sa tabella Templatedata pro totu sos duos. In it.wiki (gasi comente mi paret fintzas in sas wikipedias frantzesa, tedesca e in unas cantas àteras) bi nde sunt petzi duos: unu pro sos istados e unu a banda pro totu su chi faghet parte de un'istadu. Pro sa chistione de sa fatzilidade de impreu tenes resone, Infobox est prus lestru de impreare, fintzas ca, comente at iscritu @PNNu, tocat a isseberare ite informatziones bi bolimus pònnere a intro. Podimus fàghere gasi: creamus una categoria "Artìculos chi impreant Infobox" in ue ponimus totu sos artìculos in ue b'est Infobox, in manera chi si calicunu at a tènnere tempus e gana at a pòdere bìdere ite templates mancant e, sighende su modellu de sos artìculos, creare unu template apòsitu (mancari partende dae sos de àteras versiones de WP, comente amus fatu finas a como) chi los potzat sostituire chene chi si bidat nemmancu sa diferèntzia. Ite nde pensades? Pro su template chi b'est in Quercus ilex, imbetzes, mi paret unu problema de àtera casta: dae su chi so bidende prus che unu template ùnicu sunt medas cantzos de template postos comente templates separados (Template:Taxobox_begin, Template:Taxobox_image etz.). In sas àteras versiones de Wikipedia est un'elementu ùnicu, no apo cumpresu pro ite inoghe nono. Mi paret una faddina. As agatadu àteros esèmpios sìmiles? L2212 (talk) 23:28, 11 Nad 2021 (CET)[risponde]
@L2212 tue dd'aias fatu tando! Bellu meda! Apo fintzas bidu Template:Istadu_istòricu, bellu fintzas cussu. S'idea de sa categoria "Artìculos chi impreant Infobox" mi paret interessante e pràtica, pro mie andat bene. Comente Quercus ilex s'agatat un'àteru template giai paris, però pro is animales (bie inoghe), mancari nd'at àteros ma imoe non m'artziant a conca. Ite nde faghimus? Nde ddos bogamus a pagu a pagu e ddos remplasamus cun àteros? O comente dda bideis bos àteros? O mancari faghet a ddos sighire a usare gasi comente sunt. Mattafalluga (talk) 11:21, 12 Nad 2021 (CET)[risponde]
@Mattafalluga da su chi so bidende est su matessi template, chi diat dèpere èssere vàlidu pro sa tassonomia de totu sas ispètzies biventes. Deo dia nàrrere de nche lu bogare, ca non mi paret chi una cosa gasi, cun unu template pro cada cantzu, tèngiat sensu. Comente apo a pòdere apo a bortare su template italianu, chi tenet sa matessi gràfica e duncas penso chi siat istadu su modellu de su chi b'est inoghe, e amus a pòdere remplasare cussa roba. L2212 (talk) 11:58, 12 Nad 2021 (CET)[risponde]
The Wikimedia Foundation is planning a global consultation about communication. The goal is to bring Wikimedians and wiki-minded people together to improve tools for communication.
We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis, whatever their experience, their skills or their devices.
We are looking for input from as many different parts of the Wikimedia community as possible. It will come from multiple projects, in multiple languages, and with multiple perspectives.
We are currently planning the consultation. We need your help.
We need volunteers to help talk to their communities or user groups.
You can help by hosting a discussion at your wiki. Here's what to do:
Next, create a page (or a section on a Village pump, or an e-mail thread – whatever is natural for your group) to collect information from other people in your group. This is not a vote or decision-making discussion: we are just collecting feedback.
Then ask people what they think about communication processes. We want to hear stories and other information about how people communicate with each other on and off wiki. Please consider asking these five questions:
When you want to discuss a topic with your community, what tools work for you, and what problems block you?
What about talk pages works for newcomers, and what blocks them?
What do others struggle with in your community about talk pages?
What do you wish you could do on talk pages, but can't due to the technical limitations?
What are the important aspects of a "wiki discussion"?
You can also help build the list of the many different ways people talk to each other.
Not all groups active on wikis or around wikis use the same way to discuss things: it can happen on wiki, on social networks, through external tools... Tell us how your group communicates.
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 18:40, 13 Mar 2019 (CET)
You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
You will not be able to edit most Wikimedia wikis for up to 30 minutes on 11 April 05:00 UTC. This is because of a hardware problem. You can still read the wikis. You can see which wikis are affected. The time you can not edit might be shorter than 30 minutes. /Johan (WMF)
apo abertu un'eletzione pro su ruolu de amministradore de interfache. Sende deo giai amministradore, difatis, potzo modificare belle totu in sos artìculos, ma pro pedire sos permissos pro acontzare sa gràfica de su situ (cosa chi mi diat dèpere serbire pro pòdere impostare carchi template chi nos serbit), mi serbit un'àteru votu. Chie tenet sas caraterìsticas (prus de 50 modìficas e iscritzione fata dae a su mancu 30 dies) netzessàrias e cheret votare lu podet fàghere inoghe:Wikipedia:Amministradores/Eletziones--L2212 (talk) 22:57, 11 Abr 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
L22212 Fortzis at a cumbennere a iscrìere singolarmente a sos chi tenent su deretu a so votu, comente azis fatu pro sas eletziones de carchi mese faghet, ca podet daere chi meda pessones non lègiant su tzilleri.--Placebo2 (talk) 08:49, 18 Abr 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Salude a totus,
est dae meda chi non resesso a agatare una bortadura curreta pro narrere "insieme", de cumprendere che a sustantivu, e non che a avèrbiu. Pro fàghere carchi esempru, "un insieme di mele", "un insieme di numeri reali", "un insieme di montagne della Sardegna", "un insieme di animali".
Chirchende in su ditzionàriu de su biadu de Rubattu agato petzi s'avèrbiu. Impreende apertium.org mi lu bortat in "ammenta" ma est unu tèrmine chi no apo bidu in àteru logu e so timende chi siat una faddina. Tenides carchi idea? --Placebo2 (talk) 15:21, 25 Abr 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Pro sa matemàtica inoghe apo agatadu insieme, comente in italianu (teoria de sos insiemes). Ma fortzis diat èssere mègius a impreare grupu pro totu, comente faghent sos catalanos, sos ispagnolos e sos portoghesos cun conjunt/conjunto. Non so seguru, non so resissidu a agatare àteros chi apant iscritu de custu argumentu pro bìdere ite ant fatu.--L2212 (talk) 19:15, 1 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Apu tentu su pròpriu problema s'annu passau e no apu agatau solutzionis me is testus ca connoscia. Fia pensendi, po ita no provaus a furriai sa pregunta a Giagu Ledda? Issu scrit a s'in prus de meixina, ma ligendi testus scientìficus, mancai at giai atobiau custu fueddu.--Paninu (talk) 09:52, 3 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
No ddu connòsciu de persona. Apu sceti scambiau cancu fueddu cun issu in Facebook e at sempri arrespustu cun gentilesa. Dd'apu scritu sighendi su cumbidu in custa pàgina e seu abetendi. Chi m'arrespundit, potzu provai a ddi fai custa pregunta puru.--Paninu (talk) 15:53, 3 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Perfetu Paninu! Gràtzias! B'at de nàrrere, L2212, chi "gruppi" no andat bene ca in matemàtica, in donzi limba, "gruppo" e "insieme" sunt duas cosas diversas. Dae cara duncas, Paninu, cando dimandas custa cosa a Giagu Ledda. Diat a servire una paràula pro "insieme" e una pro "gruppo". --Placebo2 (talk) 16:06, 4 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
A pustis de prus che unu mesi, a dolu mannu G.Ledda no m'at arrespustu. Apu provau puru in Facebook ma nudda. In s'interis apu biu unu messàgiu suu innui pedit issu e totu chi ddoi at unu glossàriu de fueddus matemàticus, duncas mi parrit de cumprendi ca no ddu scit. Si signalu ca apu biu puru ca in s'universidadi de Tàtari ant fatu càncua cosa de matemàtica in sardu (in su cursu de Biotecnologias). No sciu chi siat berus, po ita no apu agatau nudda in su giassu ofitzali, sceti una fotografia in FB, ma chi est berus si podit cicai de chistionai cun is studiantis o is professoris.--Paninu (talk) 15:42, 24 Làm 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Si potzu fai una cunsideratzioni e una proposta, po s'usu matemàticu: is fueddus "insieme" "set" e is fueddus "gruppo" "group" tenint sinnificaus diferentis. Unu "gruppo" est unu "insieme" aundi cun definida un'operatzioni intra is elementus de issu e totu. Unu sinonimu de "set" est colletzioni o regorta. Duncas deu iat a imperai colletzione o regorta po sa "Set theory" e gruppu po "Group Theory". O puru su fueddu italianu cummenti cultismu, ma imperai "gruppu" po "insieme" no iat a torrai is cosas ladinas.--Tzibernetic (talk) 12:18, 2 Cab 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Apu atobiau deu puru custu fueddu, in paris cun medas atrus, furriendi in sardu s'artìculu Algoritmu. A sa fini apu lassau "insieme". Dd'eus a cambiai, chi agataus un'atru fueddu. Sa pròpiu cosa ballit po is atrus fueddus matemàticus.--Paninu (talk) 22:41, 26 Ghe 2020 (CET)[risponde]
Fintzas a mene est sutzèdidu de ddu dèpere impreare. Però no in chistiones istrintamente sientìficu-matemàticas. Deo apo semper usadu su faeddu 'impare', chi siat in campiadesu, siat in logudoresu est sa tradutzione literale de 'insieme'. Fintzas a pitiu, cando ascurtaia a is mannos, seu seguru de dd'àere intèndidu narende cun custu significadu. Àteru no est chi no unu avèrbiu sustantivadu, e si currespondet in manera casi literale a conjunt e conjunto in cadalanu e castillianu. Àtera possibilidade diat pòdere èssere a usare su trèmene latinu copia o sa tradutzione literale sua (comente si faghet in tedescu: Menge), chi benit a èssere in sardu cantidade. Chi no, andat bene fintzas insieme.--Mattafalluga (talk) 13:30, 27 Ghe 2020 (CET).[risponde]
Tando, eo dia narrere chi sa paràula cantidade no andat bene in ambitu iscientificu ca batit ambigu, e sos trèmenes tecnicos non podent essere confusos. A custu puntu si diat dèpere detzidere intre "impare", chi comente at nadu [@ Mattafalluga] podet èsser su casu de unu avèrbiu sustantivadu, e su prèstidu lessicale "insieme" dae s'italianu. Si podet fintzas pessare de pigare unu prèstidu lessicale dae su cadelanu o castiglianu. In su mentras chi nades ite nde pessades, fago carchi chirca de prus. --Placebo2 (talk) 14:28, 17 Abr 2020 (CEST)[risponde]
Saludi. A mei "impare" praxit meda de prus, ca sonat prus sardu e sonat beni puru pronuntziau a sa campidanesa "impari", ma custu est sceti su parri miu. No parit berus chi siat aici difìcili a agatai sa tradutzioni po unu fueddu chi s'agatat aici a s'ispissu. A dolu mannu, no seu arrennèsciu a ndi liai innoi prus genti chi bortat testus scientìficus in sardu de diora meda.. no cumprendu si timint chi Wikipedia ddus mossit o ita! --Paninu (talk) 11:47, 25 Abr 2020 (CEST)[risponde]
Eo puru so de acordu cun "impare" o su sinonimu "imparis" (nois impreamus ambos). Prima de fàghere carchi pàgina noa però fago carchi àtera chirca. --Placebo2 (talk) 14:40, 25 Abr 2020 (CEST)[risponde]
Tando, finas a como sos artìculos los apo postos deo, ma diat èssere una bella cosa fintzas a los votare, si calicunu est interessadu. Fio pendende de pònnere su nou su 3 o su 4, cale bos diat agradare? Sos candidados s'agatant in custa pàgina (ne podides annànghere fintzas àteros, si cherides).--L2212 (talk) 19:40, 1 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Deu ia votai po su 3, mancai ddoi bollat una curretzioni po ita ddoi at una parti in italianu ("poi dalla publicatzione dei primi album e dalle numerose apparizioni"). Is atrus artìculus candidaus funt bellus e totu e si podint lassai candidaus po su mesi chi benit.--Paninu (talk) 21:24, 1 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Saludi. Deu de sòlitu provu a cicai sa pàgina ca bollu creai. Me is resultaus, as a bii su messàgiu "Crea sa pàgina "[nòmini]" in custa wiki!". Depis sceti incarcai su nòmini. --Paninu (talk) 09:52, 3 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Salude. Apo comintzadu a fàghere un ghia pro imparare a impreare Wikipedia, ma non l'apo galu agabada; l'apo a fàghere deretu si b'at su bisongiu. In su mentras podes abaidare sa pàgina de agiudu italiana. Ti cussigio fintzas de dàere una legida a custas normas, si t'agradant. Pro pònnere sa firma cando iscries in su tzilleri (a sa fine de su messagio tuo), podes fàghere "click" comente in s'immagine chi apo postu inoghe a dresta. --Placebo2 (talk) 14:46, 3 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Salude a totus, gratzias pro s'agiudu, mi soe cumplichende unu pagu sa vida chirchende de cumprendere is cumandos basicos de wikipedia, però bi soe lompiende. Pro Placebo2, no isco comente a ti tagare, eja dda connoschia sa norma, est cussa chi soe impreende. si bolia pregontare puru, est obligu a ponnere cale grafia ses impreende me s'articulu? apo bidu chi est cosa de wikipedia in sardu isceti, acraro, chi deo iscrio in lsc potzo a no ponnere chi est lsc e lassare su comintzu limpidu? --Giuannicu (talk) 01:32, 4 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Salude Giuannicu, mira, su sentidu de pònnere cale grafia s'usat istat in su fatu ca galu b'ant unas cantas maneras diferentes de iscriere in sardu e unos àrtìculos sunt iscritos in paris tempus in prus de una variedades. A pàrrer miu est mègius chi dd'indites, a sa fine de is contos costat pagu a dd'azunghere e dat fintzas prus òrdine a sa pàgina. Annotamala, intre sardos mancari si damus contu a solos de sa variedade chi est istada impreada, ma chi intrat a castiare unu chi non connòschet bastante bene sa limba, diat pòdere non cumprèndere is diferèntzias intre is grafias diferentes o pro ite s'agatent prus artìculos subra sa matessi cosa. Un'annotadura ti cheria fàghere subra sa grafia LSC, chi mi ddu permites: non ti nd'iscarèssas de pònnere semper is atzentos giustos! Unu saludu mannu --Mattafalluga (talk) 10:36, 4 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Mi podes faghere annotaduras de totu su chi boles, ti torro gratzias pro custu, deo simplemente so chirchende de imparare e aia pensadu chi leghere e proare a iscriere innoghe mi podiat essere de agiudu. Perdonami is atzentos mi benint curretos su propriu a ddos leghere aici puru.--Giuannicu (talk) 14:20, 5 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Salude cumpàngios! Tengio una proposta de bos fàghere. Sigomente non semmus creschende meda (comente si podet bìdere dae sa lestresa cun sa cale su contadore de sos artìculos s'est movende) tocat de fàghere carchi cosa. Deo so pessende chi sa resone de totu custu si podet agatare fintzas in su fatu chi donz'unu faghet sos artìculos "a random", perdende interesse. Una solutzione chi potimus impreare est de nos seberare un'argomentu chi nos piaghet (e pertocat) dae sa lista de sos artìculos chi totu sas Wikipedias bisongiat a tènnere. Custa pàgina est istada fata dae meda, e lassada in italianu. Calicunu s'est postu a la bortare in sardu (fintzas ca si nono sos ligàmenes non si aggiornant automaticamente) e deo apo sighidu. Sa lista però est abberu manna, tando sa proposta mea est de nos seberare unu topic chi nos agradat cada unu, bortare sa setzione currispondente de custa lista, e fàghere sos artìculos chi galu mancant. Pro esempru, a mie su chi mi piaghet (e in ue apo cuntribuidu de prus) est s'iscièntzia (fìsica e ingegneria). A donzi modu, si lu cherimus fàghere, tocat de daere cara, ca a s'ispissu calicunu at giai fatu s'articulu chi b'est in sa lista, ma cun unu nùmene diferente (o cun faddinas ortogràficas) e duncas non s'aggiornat in sa lista, e paret chi galu bi manchet; duncas bos cussìgio de chircare su numene in it.wiki e poi abbaidare si b'est s'artìculu in sardu. Totu custu nos diat a serbire a su mancu pro agabare cussu bene de lista, chi non semus galu resissidos a fàghere (mancu cussa!!). Faghide•mi ischire ite nde pessades :) --Placebo2 (talk) 17:17, 4 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Bella idea. Deu seu laureau in informàtica e seu fatendi su chi potzu po spraxi de prus s'impreu de su sardu in custa matèria. Duncas potzu traballai a is pàginas de sa setzioni "Computer e Internet". A nai sa beridadi, ia giai inghitzau a furriai in sardu sa pàgina "Sistema operativu". No si potzu promiti de essi lestu, ma apa fai su chi potzu cun prexei.--Paninu (talk) 19:58, 4 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Saludi a totus! Deu seu arrangendi is boxis de sa setzioni Astronòmia, potzu agiudai cun sa setzioni Fìsica (seu unu fìsicu computatzionali, computadori o cummenti du boleis scriri) e apu una mesa idea de scriri sa boxi a pitzu de Alan Turing, ca apu spaciau immoi de ligi unu lìburu a pitzu de issu. Seu pruschetotu milliorendi boxis chi nci funt giai, ma apu scritu puru tres boxis noas, chi perou po immoi funt ancora botzas.
Tengiu una pariga de problemas: nci funt boxis chi funt ancora botzas scritas in variantis chi deu arranèsciu a ligi ma pagu a scriri (dae s'LSC a su logudoresu). Po nai: Luna est in LSC, ma est una botza bècia de tres annus, e sa boxi chi deu teniu in conca fiat unu paghixeddu prus manna (Birei is càmbius chi apu fatu a is boxis Marte e Vènere). Cun una definitzioni de LSC unu paghixeddu prus "larga" iat a arranesci puru a dda scriri aici(diferenti dae cussa chi seu usendi innoi, eh, chi est fortzis campidanesu normau), ma no sciu cantu custa est atzetada. Iat a bolli cambiai sa variedadi chentza scadenai gherras interstellaris, eis giai tentu custu problema?
Segundu: iat essi cosixedda galana a tenni unu template po is pranetas, scireis si ddu potzu creai? Cannosceis una guida?
Su de tres: me in sa boxi Unidadi astronòmica no arranèsciu a ponni is ligaminis po is atras lìnguas: mi nat ca sa boxi est proteta e no tengiu is permissus in Wikidata. Sa cosa strama est ca cun Coudu e Annu luxi no apu tentu problemas. Scireis poita no ddus potzu ponni?
Su de catru (e bo'): sa boxi a pitzu de Giove fiat in campidanesu e si tzerriàt Jove, e po custu no si bidiat me in sa lista. Ddi apu postu unu redirect, ma scireis chi est sa grafia curreta? Cancunu tenit una lista de is deus romanus in sardu?
Salude Tzibernetic, e gràtzias meda pro su traballu tuo! Andamus in òrdine:
1 - Si cheres annànghere carchi cosa e megiorare s'artìculu faghe pure e iscrie comente resessis, non penso chi bi siant problemas. Pro evitare gherras amus lassadu sa possibilidade de tènnere prus de un'istandard in su matessi artìculu (es. in Limba sarda bi sunt cosas iscritas siat in logudoresu siat in campidanesu), s'importante est a pònnere totu sas iscatuleddas de su template Variant chi serbint.
2 - Si apo a resissire apo a proare a lu creare deo in sas dies chi intrant (fortzis fintzas cras). Ghias probabilmente giai nde bi sunt ma non ti dio ischire nàrrere cales sunt ca, finas a como (fintzas pro chistiones semper de tempus) mi so limitadu a los adatare dae àteras wikipedias a s'istrutura nostra.
3 - No isco proite t'at dadu cussu messàgiu, apo proadu deo como e los at insertados chene problemas. Si torras a bìdere una cosa de su gènere nara·mi·lu, ca apo a andare pedire informatziones in sa Meta-Wiki.
4 - Lista "ufitziale" penso chi bi siat petzi cussa de sa LSC, chi podes verificare impreende su CROS. Su problema est chi si si impreant grafias diferentes bi podent èssere iscrituras diferentes, ma in cada manera "Giove" s'agatat siat in ìnternet (es. inoghe siat comente nùmene de sa divinidade in sa tradutzione de s'Odissea de Toninu Rubattu.
Pro evitare gherras amus lassadu sa possibilidade de tènnere prus de un'istandard in su matessi artìculu
Ita cosa bella! No ndi eu bidu ancora de artìculus scritus aici! Incapa apu a ponni is templates, mi creiat chi ndi podiat ponni unu sceti po boxi. No eu pensau a s'Odissea de Rubattu! Gràtzias meda po s'arrespusta e is consillus! --Tzibernetic (talk) 16:57, 28 Aus 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Deu non pentzu chi siat unu problema chi càmbias sa variedadi a sa pàgina, candu est una botza bècia, curtza e mancai scrita chena norma. Est su chi apu fat deu cun Linux. Andat beni a no fai sa gherra de is variedadis, ma chena bessì ridìculus!
Su mese coladu so istadu cuntentu chi b'at àpidu partetzipatzione, e penso chi tando andet bene, pro custu argumentu, a sighire a fàghere una votazione inoghe. Pro custu mese, cale pensades diat dèpere èssere s'artìculu de pònnere in evidèntzia?--L2212 (talk) 12:34, 29 Maj 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
AB, tando cras lu mudo. Apo isetadu carchi die ca, bidu chi su duos b'est istada sa partida intre sa Natzionale Sarda e sa Còrsica, s'artìculu fiat galu atuale meda.--L2212 (talk) 10:01, 4 Làm 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Wikidata Bridge: edit Wikidata’s data from Wikipedia infoboxes
Sorry for writing this message in English - feel free to help us translating it :)
Hello all,
Many language versions of Wikipedia use the content of Wikidata, the centralized knowledge base, to fill out the content of infoboxes. The data is stored in Wikidata and displayed, partially or completely, in the Wikipedia’s language, on the articles.
This feature is used by many template editors, but brought several issues that were raised by communities in various places: not being able to edit the data directly from Wikipedia was one of them.
This is the reason why the Wikidata Bridge project started, with the goal of offering a way to Wikipedia editors to edit Wikidata’s data more easily. This will be achieved by an interface, connected to the infobox, that users can access directly from their local wiki.
The project is now at an early stage of development. A lot of user research has been done, and will continue to be done through the different phases of the project. The next steps of development will be achieved by the development team working at Wikimedia Deutschland, starting now until the end of 2019.
In order to make sure that we’re building a tool that is answering editors’ needs, we’re using agile methods in our development process. We don’t start with a fixed idea of the tool we want to deliver: we will build it together with the editors, based on feedback loops that we will regularly organize. The first version will not necessarily have all of the features you want, but it will keep evolving.
Here’s the planned timeline:
From June to August, we will build the setup and technical groundwork.
From September to November 2019, we will develop the first version of the feature and publish a test system so you can try it and give feedback.
Later on, we will test the feature on a few projects, in collaboration with the communities.
We will first focus on early adopters communities who already implemented a shortcut from their infoboxes to edit Wikidata (for example Russian, Catalan, Basque Wikipedias)
Then we will reach some of the big Wikipedias (French, German, English) in order to see if the project scales and to address their potentially different needs.
Even later, we can consider enabling the feature on all the other projects.
In any case, no deployment or big change will be enforced on the projects without talking to the communities first, and helping the template builders to prepare for the changes they will have to do on the infoboxes’ code.
If you want to get involved, there are several ways to help:
More ideas will be added on this page along the way
If you have any questions for the development team, feel free to ask them on the main talk page. You can also ask under this message, but if you expect an answer from me, please make sure to ping me.
Salude a totus! Tando, semus arribados a su mese nou e b'at de pònnere un'artìculu nou. Ite nde pensades? Cale diat èssere, pro bois, s'artìculu de custu mese? Si b'at calicunu de nou cheret votare ma non l'at mai fatu prima e galu no l'ischit, sos candidados sunt semper inoghe, ma si nde podent semper annànghere àteros.--L2212 (talk) 13:37, 2 Trì 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Salude a totus. So Giagu Ledda e apo bidu chi calicunu m'at chircadu pro mi chèrrere preguntare a pitzu de una duda sua. Nat chi no apo rispostu, in facebook. Deo so sempre a disponimentu de sos amigos chi mi chircant. — Su cummentu non firmadu in antis est istadu insertadu dae 83.49.227.30 (cuntierras • contributziones), su 23:30, 22 Trì 2019.
Salude Giagu! Su chi t'at chircadu in Facebook est [@ Paninu], comente podes lèghere in s'arresonu inoghe in subra. Si cheres podes rispòndere fintzas inoghe, ma su cussìgiu meu est, in antis de lu fàghere, de ti registrare cun unu contu tuo. Ca gasi as a pòdere fintzas impostare sas preferèntzias tuas pro retzire notìficas a s'indiritzu de posta eletrònica tuo cada borta chi calicunu ti chircat.--L2212 (talk) 17:53, 23 Trì 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
The mobile visual editor is a simpler editing tool, for smartphones and tablets using the mobile site. The Editing team recently launched two new features to improve the mobile visual editor:
The purpose is to help contributors focus on their edits.
The team studied this with an A/B test. This test showed that contributors who could use section editing were 1% more likely to publish the edits they started than people with only full-page editing.
This is a list of our most active projects. Watch these pages to learn about project updates and to share your input on new designs, prototypes and research findings.
Edit cards: This is a clearer way to add and edit links, citations, images, templates, etc. in articles. You can try this feature now. Go here to see how:📲 Try Edit Cards.
Mobile toolbar refresh: This project will learn if contributors are more successful when the editing tools are easier to recognize.
Mobile visual editor availability: This A/B test asks: Are newer contributors more successful if they use the mobile visual editor? We are collaborating with 20 Wikipedias to answer this question.
Usability improvements: This project will make the mobile visual editor easier to use. The goal is to let contributors stay focused on editing and to feel more confident in the editing tools.
Wikimania: Several members of the Editing Team will be attending Wikimania in August 2019. They will lead a session about mobile editing in the Community Growth space. Talk to the team about how editing can be improved.
Talk Pages: In the coming months, the Editing Team will begin improving talk pages and communication on the wikis.
The VisualEditor on mobile is a good place to learn more about the projects we are working on. The team wants to talk with you about anything related to editing. If you have something to say or ask, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.
Last month, the Wikimedia Foundation's Trust & Safety team announced a future consultation about partial and/or temporary office actions. We want to let you know that the draft version of this consultation has now been posted on Meta.
This is a draft. It is not intended to be the consultation itself, which will be posted on Meta likely in early September. Please do not treat this draft as a consultation. Instead, we ask your assistance in forming the final language for the consultation.
For that end, we would like your input over the next couple of weeks about what questions the consultation should ask about partial and temporary Foundation office action bans and how it should be formatted. Please post it on the draft talk page. Our goal is to provide space for the community to discuss all the aspects of these office actions that need to be discussed, and we want to ensure with your feedback that the consultation is presented in the best way to encourage frank and constructive conversation.
Please visit the consultation draft on Meta-wiki and leave your comments on the draft’s talk page about what the consultation should look like and what questions it should ask.
Thank you for your input! -- The Trust & Safety team 10:03, 16 Aus 2019 (CEST)
The Wikimedia Foundation wants to work on two things that affect how we patrol changes and handle vandalism and harassment. We want to make the tools that are used to handle bad edits better. We also want to get better privacy for unregistered users so their IP addresses are no longer shown to everyone in the world. We would not hide IP addresses until we have better tools for patrolling.
We have an idea of what tools could be working better and how a more limited access to IP addresses would change things, but we need to hear from more wikis. You can read more about the project on Meta and post comments and feedback. Now is when we need to hear from you to be able to give you better tools to handle vandalism, spam and harassment.
You can post in your language if you can't write in English.
Salude a totus! Est torra su tempus de isseberare un'artìculu pro su mese chi intrat. Cale pensades chi diat dèpere èssere su mègius candidadu pro cabudanni?--L2212 (talk) 19:32, 27 Aus 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Saludi a totus! In s'interis chi fiu ponendi is links a is boxis in atras lìnguas (castiendi custa pagina) mi seu agatau chi ddoi fiant unus doppionis. Esempius funt:
Immoi no m'arregodu beni, ma creu chi ddoi funt atrus. Est fatzili chi capitit ca is maneras de scriri funt medas. Su primu est unu errori (no sciu cummenti si ponit su template po cancellai is boxis). Is atras si podiant evitai: custa cosa podit portai a sperdi tempus e energias. Segundu mei tocat a si donai unas regulas, asinunca arrischiaus de scriri duas bortas sa pròpia boxi. Po is pàginas chi seu scriendi immoi seu usendi medas is redirect po totus is variantis (tipu Annu luxi, Annu lughe, Annu luche), aici s'enciclopedia podit essi usada dae letoris de totus is variantis. Tipu deu iat a ponni is tìtulus de is òperas in atras lìnguas in sa lìngua originali si no b'at una bortadura in sardu.
Ita ndi penseis? --Tzibernetic (talk) 17:34, 21 Cab 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Salludi Tzibernetic, deu fintzas seu de acòrdiu a poni ist tìtulus isceti in sa limba originalli ( e a su màssimu a intru de parèntesi sa tradutzioni in sardu), difatis de is duus àrtìculus a sus de su cìnima, ia a burrai su segundu. Po su chi tocat a s'àtru a sus de is tumbas de is gigantis, apu biu ca unu est in logudoresu e s'atru in nugoresu, e s'iant a podi tenni totu e duus cun s'inditu de sa varianti ispetzìfica. Fintzas de creu ca s'usu redirect, fintzas a candu no si fetzat un'àrtìculu in sa varianti ispetzìfica, siat sa solutzioni cun prus sentidu. Prusaprestu no se seguru chi fetzat a si giai mellus règulas: medas de is chi contribùint no funt informaus de su chi si detzidit in su tzilleri. --Mattafalluga (talk) 16:25, 22 Cab 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
De acòrdiu cun bosatrus. Sa cosa de su tìtulu originali est stètia fata cun unas cantas òperas, cummenti Sleeping Beauty. Ia impreai su tìtulu sardu però candu ddoi at a su mancu una bortadura pubblicada, cummenti Pinocchio o Su Printzipeddu. Mi praxit s'idea de sa rediretzioni puru. In contu de s'arrègula, is Wikipedias in atras lìnguas tentint pàginas cun is lìneas-ghia. Podeus fai una cosa de aici nosu puru --Paninu (talk) 19:04, 22 Cab 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Deu creu chi su problema de boxis in prus bariedadis est chi iat a depi fai a biri, chi unu capitat a pitzu de una boxi, chi nci funt puru boxis in atras bariantis, cummenti in Casteddu. Custu poita Immoi fait sceti dae is boxis in LSC, creu, ma no a su contràriu. S'atru problema est chi su template LSC de immoi funtzionat sceti cun boxis chi tenint su matessi tìtulu, e agiungit /campidanesu /logudoresu /nugoresu, duncas est difitzili a ddu usai po is esèmpius a susu (tiligugu/sosoga, chi no tenit nimancu sa boxi in LSC, mancai siant stubs e no est una cosa mala meda). Si iat a podi ponni a su mancu titùlus diferentis, o asinunca fai su redirect a sa boxi. Seu circhendi de crumprendi cummenti si usant is bariabilis de is template po fai unu esèmpiu, ma po apu sceti copiau su template LSC a nai sa beridadi. S'idea est chi unu elementu de Wikidata iat a acapiai a una regorta de boxis, chi est cussu chi capitat giai cun su template LSC.
Po is lìnias-ghias seu de acòrdiu, est beru chi no est chi totus potzant castiai su tzilleri o is pàginas specialis, ma a su mancu si unu bolit ponni unu paghixeddu de òrdini scit cummenti fai :) --Tzibernetic (talk) 14:49, 24 Cab 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Salude! Iscusade ma intro in s'arresonu petzi como ca custas ùrtimas dies apo tentu meda cosa de fàghere e non so resèssidu a sighire Wikipedia. In antis de totu apo acontzadu sos esèmpios chi ais postu inoghe, impreende sos redirects. So de acordu a pònnere totu cussos chi podent èssere ùtiles pro chie chircat un'artìculu, e fintzas pro s'impreu de sos tìtulos originales francu cando b'at una versione in sardu. Pro su chi pertocat sos templates pro sas variantes los dio pòdere fintzas creare, ma semus seguros chi bi siant casos medas in ue serbant? Ca si semus chistionende de artìculos cun versiones diferentes in prus variantes chi sunt unu pagu mannitos andat bene, si sunt cosas de duas rigas deo penso chi diat èssere mègius a las aunire in sa matessi pàgina ponende sos duos o prus templates "Variant", si serbit.--L2212 (talk) 13:09, 2 Stg 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
The consultation on partial and temporary Foundation bans just started
In a recent statement, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees requested that staff hold a consultation to "re-evaluat[e] or add community input to the two new office action policy tools (temporary and partial Foundation bans)".
ita ndi narais de Mercùriu (praneta)? Chi apu castiau beni, iat essi sa prima borta cun una pàgina de astronomia e custu fait beni a s'idea ca su sardu no siat sceti lìngua po chistionai de cosa antiga.
Hello. The Readers Web team at the WMF will work on some improvements to the desktop interface over the next couple of years. The goal is to increase usability without removing any functionality. We have been inspired by changes made by volunteers, but that currently only exist as local gadgets and user scripts, prototypes, and volunteer-led skins. We would like to begin the process of bringing some of these changes into the default experience on all Wikimedia projects.
We are currently in the research stage of this project and are looking for ideas for improvements, as well as feedback on our current ideas and mockups. So far, we have performed interviews with community members at Wikimania. We have gathered lists of previous volunteer and WMF work in this area. We are examining possible technical approaches for such changes.
We would like individual feedback on the following:
Identifying focus areas for the project we have not yet discovered
Expanding the list of existing gadgets and user scripts that are related to providing a better desktop experience. If you can think of some of these from your wiki, please let us know
Feedback on the ideas and mockups we have collected so far
We would also like to gather a list of wikis that would be interested in being test wikis for this project - these wikis would be the first to receive the updates once we’re ready to start building.
When giving feedback, please consider the following goals of the project:
Make it easier for readers to focus on the content
Provide easier access to everyday actions (e.g. search, language switching, editing)
Put things in logical and useful places
Increase consistency in the interface with other platforms - mobile web and the apps
Eliminate clutter
Plan for future growth
As well as the following constraints:
Not touching the content - no work will be done in terms of styling templates or to the structure of page contents themselves
Not removing any functionality - things might move around, but all navigational items and other functionality currently available by default will remain
No drastic changes to the layout - we're taking an evolutionary approach to the changes and want the site to continue feeling familiar to readers and editors
After this round of feedback, we plan on building a prototype of suggested changes based on the feedback we receive. You’ll hear from us again asking for feedback on this prototype.
Salude a totus, ite nde pessades de bi pònnere fintzas su ditzionàriu in lìnia de sa regione in sa pàgina printzipale, in ue b'est su ligongiu de su curretore ortogràficu? B'at de nàrrere chi a bortas funtzionat bene meda, e àteras non bi partit nemmancu...
--Placebo2 (talk) 10:09, 18 Stg 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
Salude, deo dio èssere de acordu a lu pònnere, ma fortzis diat pòdere èssere mègius, imbetzes de unu ligàmene petzi a cussu, creare una pàgina cun una lista de ditzionàrios disponìbiles in lìnia. Ca bi sunt fintzas su chi at fatu Antoninu Rubattu (1 e 2 o fintzas inoghe) e àteros che a custu. Ite naras?--L2212 (talk) 09:51, 23 Stg 2019 (CEST)[risponde]
L2212 gràtzias meda, est fata bene abberu. E b'at de nàrrere chi cussu de Rubattu est su chi prefergio. Iscusa si apo acabadu de rispondere, non so traballende che a prima in wikipedia, a dolu mannu. --Placebo2 (talk) 22:26, 13 Std 2019 (CET)[risponde]
De nudda, bi diat mancare! Non b'at problema, fintzas deo in custu perìodu intre traballu e istùdiu non so resèssidu a bi traballare comente cherio.--L2212 (talk) 11:38, 14 Std 2019 (CET)[risponde]
A new beta feature will soon be deployed to your wiki: Reference Previews. As you might guess from the name, this feature gives you a preview of references in the article text. That means, you can look up a reference without jumping down to the bottom of the page.
Reference Previews have already been a beta feature on German and Arabic Wikipedia since April. Now they will become available on more wikis. Deployment is planned for October 24. More information can be found on the project page.
As always, feedback is highly appreciated. If you want to test Reference Previews, please activate the beta feature in your user preferences and let us know what you think. The best place for feedback is the central talk page. We hope the feature will serve you well in your work. Thank you from Wikimedia Deutschland's Technical Wishes project.
What talk page interactions do you remember? Is it a story about how someone helped you to learn something new? Is it a story about how someone helped you get involved in a group? Something else? Whatever your story is, we want to hear it!
Please tell us a story about how you used a talk page. Please share a link to a memorable discussion, or describe it on the talk page for this project. The team wants your examples. These examples will help everyone develop a shared understanding of what this project should support and encourage.
The Talk Pages Consultation was a global consultation to define better tools for wiki communication. From February through June 2019, more than 500 volunteers on 20 wikis, across 15 languages and multiple projects, came together with members of the Foundation to create a product direction for a set of discussion tools. The Phase 2 Report of the Talk Page Consultation was published in August. It summarizes the product direction the team has started to work on, which you can read more about here: Talk Page Project project page.
The team needs and wants your help at this early stage. They are starting to develop the first idea. Please add your name to the "Getting involved" section of the project page, if you would like to hear about opportunities to participate.
The Editing team is trying to make it simpler to edit on mobile devices. The team is changing the visual editor on mobile. If you have something to say about editing on a mobile device, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.
In September, the Editing team updated the mobile visual editor's editing toolbar. Anyone could see these changes in the mobile visual editor.
One toolbar: All of the editing tools are located in one toolbar. Previously, the toolbar changed when you clicked on different things.
New navigation: The buttons for moving forward and backward in the edit flow have changed.
Seamless switching: an improved workflow for switching between the visual and wikitext modes.
Feedback: You can try the refreshed toolbar by opening the mobile VisualEditor on a smartphone. Please post your feedback on the Toolbar feedback talk page.
Talk Pages Project: The team is thinking about the first set of proposed changes. The team will be working with a few communities to pilot those changes. The best way to stay informed is by adding your username to the list on the project page: Getting involved.
Testing the mobile visual editor as the default: The Editing team plans to post results before the end of the calendar year. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: VisualEditor as mobile default project page.
Measuring the impact of Edit Cards: This study asks whether the project helped editors add links and citations. The Editing team hopes to share results in November. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: Edit Cards project page.
Wikipedia Asian Month is back! We wish you all the best of luck for the contest. The basic guidelines of the contest can be found on your local page of Wikipedia Asian Month. For more information, refer to our Meta page for organizers.
Looking forward to meet the next ambassadors for Wikipedia Asian Month 2019!
For additional support for organizing offline event, contact our international team on wiki or on email. We would appreciate the translation of this message in the local language by volunteer translators. Thank you!
Saludi. Deu, a s'incontràtriu, preferu artìculus chi chistionint de cosas pagu traditzionalis, ma is ùrtimus artìculus de su mesi funt stètius de sport, mùsica, astronomia e informàtica, duncas Istitutu Camillo Bellieni andat beni meda po variai is argumentus --Paninu (talk) 22:33, 26 Std 2019 (CET)[risponde]
In consideration of a week-long internet block in Iran, Wikipedia Asian Month 2019 contest has been extended for a week past November. The articles submitted till 7th December 2019, 23:59 UTC will be accepted by the fountain tools of the participating wikis.
Please help us translate and spread this message in your local language.
.svg){kind=spacer}
to start editing.
